/* ============================================================
   wcag-s0085-slate.css
   WCAG 2.1 Level AA override for the S0085-Slate Kentico template.
   Owner of TFS 2852272 (1.4.3 Body/UI text contrast).

   Selectors verified against the live base CSS pulled from
   https://somersettownhomes.com on 2026-05-07.

   Audit findings:
   - Base CSS is sparse (~20KB / 191 rules). No outline-suppression,
     no sticky-header rules, no form-control rules in template's
     own CSS — almost everything inherits from Bootstrap and the
     shared footer.min.css.
   - The TFS 2852272 text-contrast issue is NOT visible in the
     template CSS dump. The failing rule may be in:
       a) Bootstrap defaults applied without override
       b) A shared widget CSS file (cookies, social, etc.)
       c) Inline styles in widget instances
     Refine this file during deploy testing — open the live page,
     run Silktide/devtools, identify the exact element/selector
     flagged, and add a targeted override here.

   Specificity strategy:
   Every selector is prefixed with `body #form` to lift above
   widget CSS load order.
   ============================================================ */


/* ------------------------------------------------------------
   WCAG 2.4.7 Focus Visible
   Bootstrap suppressors plus general fallback.
   ------------------------------------------------------------ */
body #form .navbar-toggle:focus-visible,
body #form .dropdown-toggle:focus-visible,
body #form .btn:focus-visible,
body #form .form-control:focus-visible,
body #form a:focus-visible,
body #form button:focus-visible,
body #form input:focus-visible,
body #form select:focus-visible,
body #form textarea:focus-visible,
body #form [tabindex]:focus-visible,
body #form [role="button"]:focus-visible,
body #form .footer-widget footer a:focus-visible {
  /* Webkit-style two-ring halo: blue inner ring + white outer ring
     gives focus visibility on both light AND dark backgrounds.
     The `outline` declaration is intentionally omitted — outline
     paints on top of box-shadow and would cover the white ring. */
  outline-offset: 2px;
  box-shadow: 0 0 0 2px #005fcc, 0 0 0 3px #fff;
}


/* ------------------------------------------------------------
   WCAG 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured
   Default 80px scroll-padding. Measure the actual sticky header
   height on the live site and adjust.
   ------------------------------------------------------------ */
html {
  scroll-padding-top: 80px;
}

body #form :focus-visible {
  scroll-margin-top: 80px;
}


/* ------------------------------------------------------------
   WCAG 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast (form controls)
   No template-specific form rules audited. Defensive override
   on generic form inputs.
   ------------------------------------------------------------ */
body #form input.form-control,
body #form select.form-control,
body #form textarea.form-control,
body #form input[type="text"],
body #form input[type="email"],
body #form input[type="tel"],
body #form input[type="search"],
body #form input[type="number"],
body #form input[type="password"],
body #form select,
body #form textarea {
  border-color: #595959;
}


/* ------------------------------------------------------------
   WCAG 1.4.3 Contrast Minimum (TFS 2852272 — body/UI text)
   PLACEHOLDER — exact failing selector not visible in template
   CSS. After deploy + Silktide rescan, replace this block with
   the targeted override for whatever element actually fails.
   Common likely offenders below as defensive defaults.
   ------------------------------------------------------------ */
body #form .text-muted,
body #form .muted,
body #form small.text-muted,
body #form .caption,
body #form .helper-text {
  color: #595959;
}

body #form .footer-widget footer .footer-disclosure {
  opacity: 0.85;
}


/* ------------------------------------------------------------
   WCAG 1.4.1 Use of Color (inline links)
   Defensive underline + button opt-outs. Update content selector
   after inspecting live DOM.
   ------------------------------------------------------------ */
body #form .main-content-text a,
body #form .inner-page-main-content a,
body #form .mainContent a,
body #form main p a,
body #form article p a,
body #form .content p a {
  text-decoration: underline;
  text-underline-offset: 2px;
}

body #form .btn,
body #form .button,
body #form header a,
body #form nav a,
body #form .navbar a,
body #form footer a,
body #form .footer-widget footer a,
body #form .footer-CTA-Button,
body #form .header-CTA-button,
body #form a.more-link,
body #form a.less-link {
  text-decoration: none;
}


/* ------------------------------------------------------------
   TFS 2870264 — WCAG 1.4.1 (homepage inline links)
   Slate's homepage welcome blurb lives in `.homeWelcomeText`
   (inside `.homeCta1`); the second CTA's text block is
   `.homeCta2Holder` (which also contains `.homeCta2Button`,
   a button — opted out below). The generic interior-page
   selectors above don't reach these widgets.
   ------------------------------------------------------------ */
body #form .homeWelcomeText a,
body #form .homeCta1 .homeWelcomeText a,
body #form .homeCta2Holder a {
  text-decoration: underline;
  text-underline-offset: 2px;
}

body #form .homeCta2Button,
body #form a.homeCta2Button {
  text-decoration: none;
}

/* ------------------------------------------------------------
   TFS 2905632 - WCAG 1.4.1 Use of Color (selected state)
   The Floor Plans bed/bath filter and view-switch tabs mark the
   selected item with a brand-color background + #fff text only
   (base rule sets border-color:transparent, no weight/underline).
   Add an underline so the selection is perceivable in greyscale
   and for color-blind users. `body #form` prefix keeps specificity
   above the rpWebpartCss_Floorplan* base bundles. No color changed.
   ------------------------------------------------------------ */
body #form .fp2-bed-bath ul li.active > a,
body #form .FloorPlansV2 .fp-switch-tabs .btn-default.active,
body #form .FloorPlansV3 .fp-switch-tabs .btn-default.active {
  text-decoration: underline;
  text-underline-offset: 3px;
}

/* ------------------------------------------------------------
   TFS 2905631 - WCAG 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast (form controls)
   The full-width Neighborhood search input has no perceivable
   resting border: base CSS (rpWebpartCss_NeighborhoodFullWidth.css)
   sets `border:none; background:none; color:#fff` on a dark
   rgba(0,0,0,.83) search overlay. Add a light 1px boundary at
   #cfcfcf (~9.6:1 on that dark surface; matches the widget's
   existing placeholder color). All 21 priority templates use this
   dark default - none override it to a light surface.
   ------------------------------------------------------------ */
body #form .neighborhood-widget .neighborhood-widget__search .form-group .form-control {
  border: 1px solid #cfcfcf;
}

/* WCAG 2.2 AA 2.5.8 Target Size (Pointer) — real fix (native checkbox can't be padded;
   appearance:none + explicit 24px sizing; :checked::after re-draws the check so consent UX is preserved) */
body .contact-mobile-form input[type="checkbox"],
#contactusPrivacy input[type="checkbox"],
#privacyDiv input[type="checkbox"],
#contactUsV1Privacy input[type="checkbox"] {
    -webkit-appearance: none;
    appearance: none;
    width: 24px; height: 24px;
    min-width: 24px; min-height: 24px;
    margin: 4px; padding: 0;
    border: 2px solid currentColor; border-radius: 3px;
    background: #fff; cursor: pointer; position: relative;
    vertical-align: middle; flex: 0 0 auto;
}
body .contact-mobile-form input[type="checkbox"]:checked::after,
#contactusPrivacy input[type="checkbox"]:checked::after,
#privacyDiv input[type="checkbox"]:checked::after,
#contactUsV1Privacy input[type="checkbox"]:checked::after {
    content: ""; position: absolute; left: 7px; top: 3px;
    width: 6px; height: 11px;
    border: solid #1a1a1a; border-width: 0 2px 2px 0;
    transform: rotate(45deg);
}
body .contact-mobile-form input[type="checkbox"]:focus-visible,
#contactusPrivacy input[type="checkbox"]:focus-visible,
#privacyDiv input[type="checkbox"]:focus-visible,
#contactUsV1Privacy input[type="checkbox"]:focus-visible {
    outline: 2px solid; outline-offset: 2px;
}

/* TFS 2987209 — WCAG 2.2 AAA 2.5.5 Target Size (Enhanced): expand the consent
   checkbox's pointer hit-area to 44×44 without changing anything visually
   (Option B, plan §4.4/§0.5 J — live-prototyped pixel-identical to today).
   The painted box stays 24×24 (position:relative already set above); this
   adds a transparent ::before centred over the box that only widens the
   clickable/tappable region. Do not touch :checked::after or :focus-visible
   above, and do not remove min-width/min-height:24px on the box rule above —
   on ContactUsFloating templates that min-width is the only reason the box
   is 24px wide at all (rpWebpartCss_ContactUsFloating.css sets width:auto
   !important, §0.4 D). Uses symmetric inset offsets, not
   left/top:50%+transform: live click-testing found percentage-based
   centering lands ~1-2px off-centre (asymmetric vs. the border-box),
   which stole clicks from an adjacent control (Submit button /
   privacy-policy link) on 3 of 16 templates — insets centre reliably
   regardless of border width. */
body .contact-mobile-form input[type="checkbox"]::before,
#contactusPrivacy input[type="checkbox"]::before,
#privacyDiv input[type="checkbox"]::before,
#contactUsV1Privacy input[type="checkbox"]::before {
    content: "";
    position: absolute;
    top: -12px; left: -12px; right: -12px; bottom: -12px;
}

/* ------------------------------------------------------------
   TFS 2982346 - WCAG 2.2 AA 2.5.8 Target Size (Pointer): footer links

   Live-measured on slateqanew.sat-ws.realpage.com/Contact.aspx at 1280x900
   (headless Chrome, border-box heights): 1 footer target(s) under 24x24.

     footer .footer-property-logo a                 226.7 x 21, display:inline, wraps an <img>

   These are display:inline, where `line-height` cannot help - it does not
   change an inline element's border-box height. inline-block is what makes
   min-height apply. No padding and no negative-margin cancel is used: each
   target sits in a line box already at or above 24px, so the box grows into
   existing leading. Verified by injecting these rules into the live SAT page:
   0 targets remaining, document height +0px, no horizontal overflow.

   SCOPE PREFIX: scoped on the `footer` element. On THIS template
   `.footer-widget footer` also matches, so either prefix would work - the bare
   `footer` is used for consistency across the 18 template files in this ticket,
   three of which genuinely need it (Zen-Garden and Au-Courant nest
   `footer > .footer-widget`, reversed; Jackson-Square has no `.footer-widget`
   element at all). `footer` is a superset of both nestings. Verified against
   the live SAT DOM per template - not assumed.
   ------------------------------------------------------------ */

footer .footer-property-logo a {
    display: inline-block;
    min-height: 24px;
}
